Master’s in C-UAS and Airspace Risk Management Engineering
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in C-UAS and airspace risk management engineering, structured in 12 modules covering non-cooperative UAS risk, the legal framework, airspace risk management, detection technologies, data fusion, response and mitigation, incident management, U-space integration, system evaluation, ethics and privacy, and critical infrastructure protection, with an assigned technical tutor.
Take the controls.
Run a real engineering trade-off from this field. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.
What you will be able to do
Understand the risk that non-cooperative UAS pose to airspace.
Apply the European and national legal framework for airspace protection.
Assess the risks and vulnerabilities of critical infrastructure.
Analyse detection and data fusion technologies.
Design proportionate incident management procedures.
Integrate surveillance with U-space services and geo-awareness.
Evaluate the ethical and privacy aspects of aerial surveillance.
Who it's for
- Airport security managers.
- Airspace risk analysts.
- Surveillance systems engineers.
- Critical infrastructure protection managers.
- UAS security consultants.
- Emergency management coordinators.
- Engineering or science graduates seeking to enter the airport sector.
What you'll work with
- Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/947 (rules and procedures for the operation of unmanned aircraft)
- Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/664 (regulatory framework for U-space)
- Regulation (EU) 139/2014 (aerodrome requirements and procedures)
- Directive (EU) 2022/2557 (resilience of critical entities)
- Regulation (EU) 2016/679 GDPR (protection of personal data)
- ICAO Doc 10019 (Manual on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems)
- ISO 31000 (risk management guidelines)
- EUROCAE ED-286 (operational services and environment definition for counter-UAS in controlled airspace)
- QGIS
- MATLAB
- Remote ID receiver SDKs
- ArcGIS Pro
- Python
12 modules · 1900 h
1.1Drone incidents at airports1.2The Gatwick Airport case, 20181.3Types of drone misuse1.4Vulnerability of critical infrastructure1.5Risk perception and its evolution1.6Public and private stakeholders involved1.7Classification of threats by intent1.8Lessons from public events1.9Challenges of airspace protection1.10Case study: analysis of an airport incident
2.1Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/9472.2UAS geographical zones and restrictions2.3Powers of law enforcement2.4Use of the radio spectrum2.5Legal limitations on neutralisation2.6European counter-drone strategy2.7Protection of critical infrastructure2.8Responsibilities of the airport operator2.9Data protection in detection2.10Workshop: responsibility map at an airport
3.1Risk analysis methodologies3.2Hazard identification3.3Probability and severity matrices3.4Vulnerability assessment3.5Consequence analysis3.6Strategic risk mitigations3.7Acceptable residual risk3.8Integration into the SMS3.9Periodic risk review3.10Practical exercise: UAS risk assessment of a regional airport
4.1Low-level radar and its limitations4.2Radio frequency detection4.3Electro-optical and infrared sensors4.4Acoustic detection and its limitations4.5Remote ID as a cooperative source4.6Performance and false alarms4.7Coverage and shadow zones4.8Environmental factors in detection4.9Sensor comparison4.10Lab: coverage analysis of an RF sensor
5.1Command and control architectures5.2Multi-sensor track fusion5.3Classification and identification5.4Artificial intelligence in classification5.5Operational airspace visualisation5.6Integration with airport systems5.7Alarm management5.8System interoperability5.9Event logging5.10Practical exercise: fusion logic for two sensors
6.1Principles of proportionality6.2Decision and authorisation chain6.3Collateral damage considerations6.4Effects on aeronautical services6.5Coordination with air traffic control6.6Protocols for suspending operations6.7Passive and protective measures6.8Restrictions on the use of jamming6.9Ethical assessment of the response6.10Case study: response decision tree at an airport
7.1Airport contingency plans7.2Notification procedures7.3Coordination between the agencies involved7.4Operational continuity management7.5Communication with passengers and the media7.6Recovery of operations7.7Post-incident investigation7.8Lessons learned and improvement7.9Exercises and drills7.10Workshop: tabletop exercise at an airport
8.1Geozones and geofences8.2Network identification services8.3Non-conformance detection8.4Information for legitimate operators8.5Data on authorised flights8.6Distinguishing cooperative and non-cooperative traffic8.7Information exchange with authorities8.8Interfaces with USSPs8.9Prevention through geo-awareness8.10Case study: integrating Remote ID with airport surveillance
9.1Definition of operational requirements9.2Performance metrics9.3Testing in controlled environments9.4Benchmarking methodologies9.5Equipment certification9.6Electromagnetic compatibility with airport systems9.7Life cycle and costs9.8Public procurement of systems9.9European evaluation references9.10Practical exercise: evaluation matrix for detection systems
10.1Privacy in airspace surveillance10.2GDPR impact assessment10.3Transparency and accountability10.4Responsible use of AI10.5Rights of legitimate operators10.6Public communication and transparency10.7International debates on surveillance10.8Balancing security and civil liberties10.9Codes of conduct10.10Case study: data protection impact assessment
11.1Protection of power plants11.2Ports and port facilities11.3Prisons and correctional facilities11.4Mass events and stadiums11.5Government buildings and institutional headquarters11.6Operator security plans11.7Coordination with local authorities11.8Design of surveillance perimeters11.9Residual risk management11.10Practical exercise: aerial surveillance plan for a sporting event
12.1Selection of the protected environment12.2Threat and vulnerability analysis12.3Risk assessment12.4Detection architecture design12.5Incident management procedures12.6Legal and ethical analysis12.7Cost assessment12.8Implementation plan12.9Master's Thesis report12.10Master's Thesis: defence before a panel
How you'll learn
The programme is delivered 100% online on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable material, recorded classes and an assigned technical tutor. There are no fixed timetables: you progress at your own pace within each intake, so you can combine it with your job.
Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original regulations and applied exercises. The working software is QGIS, MATLAB, Remote ID receiver SDKs, ArcGIS Pro and Python, in free, academic or evaluation versions. Exercises are based on real procedures: airport risk assessments, tabletop exercises for drone incidents and sensor coverage analysis. Assessment is continuous for each module, plus the final Master's Thesis.
Standards covered: Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/947, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/664 on U-space, Regulation (EU) 139/2014, Directive (EU) 2022/2557 on the resilience of critical entities, Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR), ICAO Doc 10019 Manual on RPAS, ISO 31000, EUROCAE ED-286.
Build it end to end
Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.
Where this takes you
Requirements
- University degree in engineering, science or architecture, or equivalent demonstrable professional experience.
- Internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme's software.
- English sufficient to read technical standards.
Ready to start?
Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.
Frequently asked questions
The programme totals 1,900 hours over 12–14 months. You set your own pace within each intake, and your tutor helps you plan the workload around your job.
You work with QGIS, MATLAB, Remote ID receiver SDKs, ArcGIS Pro and Python, using free, academic or evaluation versions. Your tutor indicates the free alternative wherever one exists.
A SEIUM Institute diploma, awarded on passing the continuous assessment and the Master's Thesis. It is SEIUM's own qualification, not an official state degree; its recognition depends on the programme completed and the regulations of each country.
Yes. Modules passed in a course or postgraduate diploma in the same area are recognised in the higher programme. Ask about the recognition policy when you enrol.
A university degree in engineering, science or architecture (or equivalent professional experience), a computer able to run the software, and English sufficient to read technical standards.
Start dates are set by SEIUM's faculty for each intake. Our admissions team will confirm the next available date when you apply.
Related programmes
Master’s in CAMO & Continuing Airworthiness Engineering
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in CAMO and continuing airworthiness engineering. 12 modules covering Regulation (EU) 1321/2014, Part CAMO, Part M and Part 145, maintenance…
Master’s in Satellite AIT Engineering
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in satellite AIT engineering. 12 modules covering verification, clean rooms, mechanical, electrical and software integration, mechanical, thermal and EMC testing,…
Master’s in Drone Engineering for Industrial and Infrastructure Inspection
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in drone engineering for industrial and infrastructure inspection, structured in 12 modules covering inspection sensors, applied thermography, energy and civil…
More in Aerospace, UAM, Drones & Space
All Aerospace, UAM, Drones & Space programmes → · How to apply · Fees & financing · Scholarships