Master’s in Accident Investigation and Root Cause Engineering
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in Accident Investigation and Root Cause Engineering, with 12 modules covering accident causation theories, organising investigations, evidence collection, witness interviews, causal and systemic analysis, human factors, forensic analysis, sector investigations, recommendations and reporting, with an assigned technical tutor.
Take the controls.
Run a real engineering trade-off from this field. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.
What you will be able to do
Apply linear and systemic models of accident causation.
Organise independent and effective investigations.
Collect and preserve physical, documentary and testimonial evidence.
Analyse root causes with structured techniques.
Integrate human and organisational factors into the analysis.
Formulate measurable recommendations and track their effectiveness.
Write objective and useful investigation reports.
Who it's for
- Accident investigators.
- Occupational health and safety technicians specialising in investigation.
- Human factors analysts.
- Technical experts and expert witnesses.
- Organisational learning managers.
- Operational safety auditors.
- Engineering or science graduates looking to move into the process industry.
What you'll work with
- Law 31/1995 (Occupational Risk Prevention Act, Spain)
- ICAO Annex 13 to the Chicago Convention (aircraft accident and incident investigation)
- Regulation (EU) 996/2010 (investigation of civil aviation accidents)
- Directive (EU) 2016/798 (railway safety)
- IMO Casualty Investigation Code (marine casualties and incidents)
- Directive 2012/18/EU (Seveso III, major-accident hazards)
- ISO 45001 (occupational health and safety management systems)
- TapRooT
- XMind
- Microsoft Visio
- NVivo
- SAM Tool
12 modules · 1900 h
1.1Heinrich's domino model1.2Epidemiological and Swiss cheese models1.3Systemic accident models1.4Leveson's STAMP and hierarchical control1.5Hollnagel's FRAM1.6Perrow's normal accidents1.7Dekker's drift into failure1.8Hindsight bias and causality1.9Choosing the model for each event1.10Case study: a systemic re-reading of Challenger
2.1Investigation policy and procedure2.2Classification of events by severity2.3Composition of the investigation team2.4Independence and conflicts of interest2.5Official investigation bodies2.6Royal Decree 389/2024, CIAF and CIAIAC2.7Coordination with judicial investigation2.8Investigation timescales and resources2.9Just and non-punitive culture2.10Workshop: corporate investigation procedure
3.1Preserving the scene3.2Physical, documentary and digital evidence3.3Forensic photography and sketches3.4Chain of custody3.5Data recorders and black boxes3.6Data from distributed control systems (DCS)3.7Materials failure analysis3.8Reconstructing the timeline3.9Laboratory testing of components3.10Practical exercise: evidence collection plan in a plant
4.1Psychology of eyewitness testimony4.2Cognitive interview technique4.3Preparing interviews4.4Formulating open questions4.5Interviewing affected people4.6Interviewer biases4.7Recording and validating statements4.8Group interviews and reconstructions4.9Legal aspects of statements4.10Lab: simulated cognitive interview
5.1Five whys and its limitations5.2Ishikawa diagram5.3Failed barrier analysis5.4Change analysis5.5Events and causal factors charting5.6INRS cause trees5.7The TapRooT method and its root cause tree5.8ICAM incident analysis method5.9Comparison of methods5.10Practical exercise: cause tree of an occupational accident
6.1CAST based on STAMP6.2Rasmussen's AcciMap6.3Applying FRAM to events6.4Performance variability analysis6.5Organisational and regulatory factors6.6Production pressures6.7Analysis of management decisions6.8Modelling tools6.9Validity of systemic analyses6.10Lab: CAST analysis of a railway incident
7.1HFACS human factors taxonomy7.2Error, violation and adaptation7.3Analysis of work-as-done versus work-as-imagined7.4Fatigue and operator conditions7.5Interface design as a cause7.6Staff training and competence7.7Communication and teamwork7.8Avoiding individual blame7.9Organisational context of error7.10Case study: applying HFACS to an aviation event
8.1Fractography and mechanical failures8.2Corrosion and materials failures8.3Analysis of fires and explosions8.4Electrical and control failures8.5Software and systems analysis8.6Simulation of the sequence of events8.7Technical expert assessment and expert reports8.8Collaboration with forensic laboratories8.9Interpretation of results8.10Practical exercise: fracture analysis of a component
9.1Occupational accidents and the Labour Inspectorate9.2Events in the process industry9.3Aviation investigation under ICAO Annex 139.4Railway accidents and Directive 2016/7989.5Marine casualties and the IMO Casualty Investigation Code9.6Healthcare incidents and patient safety9.7Road traffic accidents9.8Events in nuclear power9.9Cyber incidents with physical impact9.10Case study: comparison of official reports
10.1Writing effective recommendations10.2Hierarchy of controls in recommendations10.3Tracking corrective actions10.4Measuring effectiveness10.5Event databases10.6Analysis of trends and precursors10.7Sharing lessons learned10.8Double-loop organisational learning10.9Learning indicators10.10Workshop: action plan based on recommendations
11.1Structure of official reports11.2Objective and verifiable writing11.3Use of diagrams and timelines11.4Peer review11.5Communication with those affected11.6Legal aspects of the report11.7Confidentiality of sources11.8Presentation to management11.9Report publication and transparency11.10Practical exercise: writing a complete report
12.1Selection of the event analysed12.2Gathering public evidence12.3Chronological reconstruction of the event12.4Linear causal analysis12.5Systemic analysis with CAST or FRAM12.6Human and organisational factors12.7Recommendations and follow-up12.8Comparison with the official investigation12.9Master's Thesis report12.10Master's Thesis: defence before a panel
How you'll learn
100% online learning on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable materials, recorded classes and an assigned technical tutor. No fixed timetables: you progress at your own pace within each intake, so it fits around your job.
Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original standard and applied exercises. The working software is TapRooT, XMind, Microsoft Visio, NVivo and SAM Tool, in free, academic or evaluation versions. Testing is studied through real procedures: reconstruction of events from evidence, simulated cognitive interviews and systemic analyses with CAST and FRAM. Assessment is continuous for each module, plus the final Master's Thesis.
Standards covered: Law 31/1995, ICAO Annex 13 to the Chicago Convention, Regulation (EU) 996/2010, Directive (EU) 2016/798, IMO Casualty Investigation Code, Directive 2012/18/EU (Seveso III), ISO 45001.
Build it end to end
Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.
Where this takes you
Requirements
- University degree in engineering, science or architecture, or equivalent demonstrable professional experience.
- Internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme's software.
- English sufficient to read technical standards.
Ready to start?
Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.
Frequently asked questions
The programme totals 1,900 hours over 12–14 months. You set your own pace within each intake, and your tutor helps you plan the workload around your job.
You work with TapRooT, XMind, Microsoft Visio, NVivo and SAM Tool, using free, academic or evaluation versions. Your tutor indicates the free alternative wherever one exists.
A SEIUM Institute diploma, awarded on passing the continuous assessment and the Master's Thesis. It is SEIUM's own qualification, not an official state degree; its recognition depends on the programme completed and the regulations of each country.
Yes. Modules passed in a course or postgraduate diploma in the same area are recognised in the higher programme. Ask about the recognition policy when you enrol.
A university degree in engineering, science or architecture (or equivalent professional experience), a computer able to run the programme's software and English sufficient to read technical standards.
Start dates are set by SEIUM's faculty for each intake. Our admissions team will confirm the next available date when you apply.
Related programmes
Master’s in Health and Safety Engineering in Maritime and Offshore Operations
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in health and safety engineering for maritime and offshore operations. 12 modules covering maritime hazards, SOLAS, MLC and STCW, maritime…
Master’s in Energy and Power Engineering for Wearables
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in energy and power engineering for wearables. 12 modules covering energy budgets, batteries, battery management and charging, power conversion, wireless…
Master’s in Fatigue, Shift Work and Sleep Management Engineering in Operations
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in Fatigue, Shift Work and Sleep Management Engineering for Operations, with 12 modules covering sleep biology, operational fatigue, shift design,…
More in Health, Biomechanics, Wearables & Operational Safety
All Health, Biomechanics, Wearables & Operational Safety programmes → · How to apply · Fees & financing · Scholarships