Diploma in UN Standards and Autonomous Weapons
Online postgraduate diploma of 800 hours in UN standards and autonomous weapons: 8 modules covering autonomy in weapon systems, international humanitarian law, the CCW and the United Nations, meaningful human control, Article 36 legal reviews, national policies and the ethics of military AI, with an assigned technical tutor.
Take the controls.
Run a real engineering trade-off from this field. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.
What you will be able to do
Understand the international debate on lethal autonomous weapon systems.
Analyse the applicable framework of international humanitarian law.
Interpret the work of the CCW and the UN General Assembly.
Apply the concept of meaningful human control.
Carry out legal reviews of new weapons under Article 36.
Compare national policies on autonomy in weapon systems.
Draft well-founded regulatory proposals and positions.
Who it's for
- Arms control analysts.
- Legal advisers in international humanitarian law.
- Artificial intelligence ethics specialists.
- Disarmament diplomats.
- Security policy researchers.
- Defence regulatory compliance consultants.
- Engineering or science graduates seeking to work in international organisations.
What you'll work with
- Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW)
- Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions, Article 36 (legal review of new weapons)
- Guiding Principles of the Group of Governmental Experts on LAWS (2019)
- UN General Assembly Resolution 78/241 (2023)
- DoD Directive 3000.09 (autonomy in weapon systems, 2023)
- UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence (2021)
- Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
- ICRC Customary IHL Database
- UN Digital Library
- Zotero
- NVivo
8 modules
1.1Concepts of autonomy and automation1.2Critical functions of target selection and engagement1.3Existing automatic defensive systems1.4Artificial intelligence in defence1.5Technical limitations of AI1.6Predictability and reliability1.7Algorithmic bias1.8Taxonomies of autonomy1.9The terminology debate1.10Case study: classifying systems by their autonomy
2.1Principles of distinction, proportionality and precaution2.2The Martens Clause2.3Weapons prohibited by their nature2.4Command responsibility2.5Individual criminal responsibility2.6State responsibility2.7International human rights law2.8Application in peacetime2.9ICRC interpretations2.10Workshop: analysing a scenario in the light of IHL
3.1Structure of the CCW3.2Group of Governmental Experts3.3The 2019 Guiding Principles3.4Proposals for a legal instrument3.5General Assembly resolutions3.6Role of the Secretary-General3.7Positions of groups of States3.8Civil society and campaigns3.9Negotiation prospects3.10Practical exercise: analysis of national positions
4.1Origin of the concept4.2Control in design, deployment and use4.3Human judgement and supervision4.4Time and space constraints4.5Human-machine interaction4.6Automation bias4.7Operator training4.8Control indicators4.9Criticisms of the concept4.10Case study: assessing human control in a system
5.1Article 36 of Additional Protocol I5.2National review procedures5.3Review of AI-enabled systems5.4Testing and evaluation for the review5.5Review throughout the life cycle5.6Transparency of reviews5.7International good practice5.8Cooperation between States5.9Limitations of the mechanism5.10Workshop: structure of an Article 36 legal review
6.1DoD Directive 3000.096.2NATO Principles of Responsible Use of AI6.3Positions of the EU and the European Parliament6.4The EU AI Act and the military exclusion6.5Policies of China and Russia6.6Political Declaration on Responsible Military Use of AI6.7REAIM initiatives6.8Spain's policies6.9Comparison of approaches6.10Practical exercise: comparing national policies
7.1Arguments for and against a ban7.2Human dignity7.3The accountability gap7.4Risks of escalation and proliferation7.5Research ethics7.6Corporate codes of conduct7.7The UNESCO Recommendation7.8Confidence-building mechanisms7.9Future governance7.10Case study: ethical dilemma in a research programme
8.1Defining the problem8.2Applicable legal framework8.3Analysis of positions8.4Proposed definitions8.5Proposed obligations8.6Verification mechanisms8.7Feasibility assessment8.8Position paper8.9Report and presentation8.10Final project: final review with your tutor
How you'll learn
Training is 100% online on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable material, recorded classes and an assigned technical tutor. There are no fixed timetables: you progress at your own pace within each intake, so the programme can be combined with work.
Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original legal instruments and applied exercises. The working tools are the ICRC Customary IHL Database, UN Digital Library, Zotero and NVivo, in free, academic or evaluation versions. Practical work is based on real procedures: analysis of national positions at the CCW, drafting of an Article 36 legal review and simulation of a multilateral negotiation. Assessment is continuous by module, plus the final project.
Standards covered: Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW), Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions (Article 36), 2019 GGE Guiding Principles on LAWS, UN General Assembly Resolution 78/241, DoD Directive 3000.09, UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
Build it end to end
Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.
Where this takes you
Requirements
- Prior technical training or professional experience in the sector. No university degree is required.
- An internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme software.
- English sufficient to read technical standards.
Ready to start?
Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.
Frequently asked questions
The programme totals 800 hours over 6–8 months. You set your own pace within each intake, and your tutor helps you plan the workload around your job.
You work with the ICRC Customary IHL Database, UN Digital Library, Zotero and NVivo, using free, academic or evaluation versions. Your tutor indicates the free alternative wherever one exists.
A SEIUM Institute diploma, awarded on passing the continuous assessment and the final project. It is SEIUM's own qualification, not an official state degree; its recognition depends on the programme completed and the regulations of each country.
Yes. Modules passed are recognised in a higher programme in the same area (postgraduate diploma or master's). Ask about the recognition policy when you enrol.
Prior technical training or professional experience in the sector (no university degree required), a computer able to run the software and English sufficient to read technical standards.
Start dates are set by SEIUM's faculty for each intake. Our admissions team will confirm the next available date when you apply.
Related programmes
Diploma in Metal AM Processes for Defence
Online postgraduate diploma of 800 hours in metal AM processes for defence: 8 modules covering metal additive processes, process physics, design for additive manufacturing to ISO/ASTM…
Diploma in Anti-Drone Standards (EU/US/NATO)
Online postgraduate diploma of 800 hours in anti-drone (C-UAS) regulations across the EU, US and NATO. 8 modules covering the drone threat, European and US regulatory…
Postgraduate Diploma in Integration of Optical and Aiming Systems
Online 800-hour Postgraduate Diploma in Integration of Optical and Aiming Systems. 8 modules covering ISO 10110 (drawings of optical elements), IEC 60825-1 (laser product safety) and…
More in Defense, Military Engineering & Land Systems
All Defense, Military Engineering & Land Systems programmes → · How to apply · Fees & financing · Scholarships