Course in Ethics in Failure Simulation
Online 300-hour course in ethics in failure simulation. 6 modules covering IEC 61508 (functional safety), IEC 60812 (failure mode and effects analysis, FMEA) and Isograph FaultTree+. Dedicated tutor and open enrolment.
Take the controls.
Run a real engineering trade-off from this programme. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.
What you will be able to do
Master the main failure simulation and analysis techniques.
Identify assumptions, simplifications and the limits of validity of models.
Apply the requirements of functional safety standards to failure analysis.
Recognise ethical dilemmas when setting tolerable risks and omitting scenarios.
Analyse the challenges of autonomous systems in accordance with ISO 21448 and UL 4600.
Communicate the uncertainty of simulation results honestly.
Carry out a responsible and documented failure analysis for a real system.
Who it's for
- Functional safety engineer looking to specialise in Ethics in Failure Simulation.
- Reliability engineer looking to specialise in Ethics in Failure Simulation.
- RAMS analyst looking to specialise in Ethics in Failure Simulation.
- Independent safety assessor looking to specialise in Ethics in Failure Simulation.
- Autonomous systems engineer looking to specialise in Ethics in Failure Simulation.
- Certification consultant looking to specialise in Ethics in Failure Simulation.
- Graduates in engineering or sciences seeking to enter the automotive industry.
What you'll work with
- IEC 61508 (functional safety)
- IEC 60812 (failure mode and effects analysis, FMEA)
- IEC 61025 (fault tree analysis)
- ISO 26262 (functional safety in road vehicles)
- ISO 21448 (SOTIF, safety of the intended functionality)
- SAE ARP4761 (safety assessment of civil aircraft)
- MIL-STD-882E (system safety)
- UL 4600 (safety of autonomous products)
6 modules · 300 h
1.1Fault, error and failure: terminology1.2Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) according to IEC 608121.3Fault trees according to IEC 610251.4Markov analysis and reliability1.5Fault injection in hardware and software1.6Monte Carlo reliability simulation1.7Digital twins for failure scenarios1.8Hardware-in-the-loop testing1.9Common and dependent failure modes1.10Laboratory: fault tree of a braking system
2.1Failure independence hypotheses2.2Quality of failure rate data2.3Epistemic and aleatory uncertainty2.4Validation of simulation models2.5Unconsidered scenarios and black swans2.6Bias of the modeller and of the client2.7Sensitivity of results to parameters2.8Documentation of limitations2.9Peer review of models2.10Practice: sensitivity analysis of an FMEA model
3.1IEC 61508 and SIL levels3.2ISO 26262 and ASIL levels3.3ISO 21448 and the intended functionality (SOTIF)3.4ARP4761 in aeronautical safety assessment3.5Safety arguments and GSN notation3.6Simulation evidence in certification3.7Qualified tools for simulation3.8Independence of the assessment3.9Responsibility of the safety assessor3.10Case study: safety argument for an ADAS system
4.1Acceptable risk and the ALARP criterion4.2Statistical value of life in decisions4.3Concealment of known failure modes4.4Pressure to downgrade criticality4.5Military system failures and harm to third parties4.6Shared responsibility in supply chains4.7The Boeing 737 MAX case and the MCAS system4.8The Therac-25 case4.9Communication of residual risks4.10Workshop: structured debate on the MCAS case
5.1Perception and classification failures5.2Controlled degradation and safe modes5.3Loss of command and control link5.4Cyberattacks as failure modes5.5Risk-based test scenarios5.6Scenario coverage and stopping criteria5.7Human-machine interaction during failures5.8Event logging for investigation5.9Transparency towards operators and regulators5.10Practice: catalogue of failure scenarios for a UGV
6.1Selection of the system and its context6.2Functional model and architecture6.3FMEA and fault tree analysis6.4Simulation of critical scenarios6.5Assessment of uncertainties6.6Safety argument6.7Ethical assessment of residual risks6.8Communication plan for results6.9Report and presentation6.10Final review with the tutor
How you'll learn
100% online training on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable material, recorded classes and a dedicated technical tutor. No fixed timetables: students progress at their own pace within the intake, which makes it possible to combine the programme with work.
Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original standard and applied exercises. The working software is Isograph FaultTree+, ReliaSoft BlockSim, MATLAB/Simulink, ANSYS medini analyze, in free, academic or evaluation versions. Tests are studied using real FMEA and fault tree analysis procedures, fault injection in simulation, and independent reviews of safety cases. Assessment is continuous by module, plus the final integrative project.
Build it end to end
Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.
Master the main failure simulation and analysis techniques.
Identify assumptions, simplifications and the limits of validity of models.
Apply the requirements of functional safety standards to failure analysis.
Recognise ethical dilemmas when setting tolerable risks and omitting scenarios.
Analyse the challenges of autonomous systems in accordance with ISO 21448 and UL 4600.
Where this takes you
Requirements
- No prior degree is required.
- Internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme's software.
- Sufficient Spanish to follow technical standards documentation.
Ready to start?
Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.
Frequently asked questions
The programme totals 300 hours spread over 3 to 5 months. That is between 10 and 15 hours a week on average, compatible with a full-time job.
You work with Isograph FaultTree+, ReliaSoft BlockSim, MATLAB/Simulink and ANSYS medini analyze. Free, academic or evaluation versions are used, and the tutor indicates the free alternative where one exists.
A SEIUM own diploma upon passing the continuous assessment and the integrative project. It is in-house training, not an official qualification from the Ministry.
Yes. Modules passed in a course or Postgraduate Diploma in the same area are recognised towards the higher-level programme. Please check the recognition policy when you enrol.
Related programmes
Safe Cargo Stowage Regulations Course
300-hour online course in safe cargo stowage regulations. 6 modules covering the Code of Safe Practice for Cargo Stowage and Securing (CSS Code), SOLAS Convention, chapters…
Wave Energy Device Modelling Course
Online 300-hour course in modelling wave energy devices. 6 modules covering IEC TS 62600-100 Assessment of electrical power performance of wave energy converters, IEC TS 62600-103…
Climate Control in Classic Vehicle Storage Course
Online 300-hour course in climate control in classic vehicle storage. 6 modules covering EN 15757 (temperature and relative humidity for hygroscopic organic materials), EN 16893 (buildings…
More in Off-Road, Special Vehicles & Machinery
All Off-Road, Special Vehicles & Machinery programmes → · How to apply · Fees & financing · Scholarships