- BVLOS operations need an equivalent to the pilot’s “see and avoid” duty.
- DAA combines cooperative surveillance (e.g. ADS-B) with non-cooperative sensors such as radar and cameras.
- Regulators assess DAA as part of the overall operational risk, not as a single device.
Why detect and avoid matters
When a drone flies within visual line of sight, the remote pilot watches for other aircraft. Beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) — pipeline inspection, long-range delivery, mapping — that is no longer possible. A detect-and-avoid (DAA) capability must find conflicting traffic and obstacles and act in time, either automatically or by alerting the pilot.
Cooperative and non-cooperative traffic
- Cooperative aircraft broadcast their position, for example through ADS-B or other electronic conspicuity devices. Receiving these signals is relatively cheap and reliable.
- Non-cooperative aircraft — gliders, balloons, some light aircraft and other drones — may transmit nothing. Detecting them needs onboard or ground-based radar, electro-optical and infrared cameras, or acoustic sensors.
The DAA function chain
A DAA system typically works in stages: detect the intruder, track it, evaluate whether a conflict is developing, decide on a manoeuvre and execute it, all within the time available. Sensor fusion and tracking algorithms are central, and so is the latency of the command-and-control link if a human is in the loop.
Regulation and safety assessment
In Europe, BVLOS operations in the specific category are commonly assessed with the SORA methodology, which looks at ground and air risk together. In the United States, BVLOS rules are being developed by the FAA. Industry standards such as those from RTCA and EUROCAE define performance requirements for DAA systems. Across jurisdictions the logic is similar: the required robustness of DAA depends on the airspace and the risk of the operation.
Engineering challenges
Small drones have tight limits on size, weight and power, so sensors must be light and efficient. Detection range must be long enough to allow avoidance at the closing speeds involved. And machine-learning-based vision systems must be validated in a way regulators can trust — a problem very similar to the one automotive engineers face in functional safety for ADAS.
Explore our aerospace, UAM, drones and space programmes to work on these systems.
Learn this with engineers who do it
Online, project-based programmes in Aerospace, UAM, Drones & Space. Admissions reply within 72 hours.
More from the technical blog

ISO 26262 Explained: Functional Safety for Automotive Engineers
A practical introduction to ISO 26262: hazard analysis, ASIL levels, the V-model and what functional safety means for ADAS and software-defined vehicles.
Read the article →
Grid-Forming Inverters: Why Power Systems with More Renewables Need Them
As synchronous generators retire, inverters must help set voltage and frequency. How grid-forming control differs from grid-following, and why it matters.
Read the article →
Brake Cooling in Motorsport: Ducts, Discs and Thermal Limits
How race engineers keep brakes inside their working window: heat generation, carbon and iron discs, duct design and the data used to…
Read the article →