Open vs Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycles Course
300-hour online course on open vs closed nuclear fuel cycles. 6 modules covering IAEA SSR-4 (safety of fuel cycle facilities), Directive 2011/70/Euratom (management of spent fuel and waste) and SCALE (ORIGEN). Assigned tutor and open enrolment.
Take the controls.
Run a real engineering trade-off from this programme. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.
What you will be able to do
Describe the stages of open and closed fuel cycles.
Compare the use of uranium resources in each cycle.
Analyse radiotoxicity and waste volume according to strategy.
Evaluate the economics and industrial maturity of reprocessing.
Assess the implications of safeguards and non-proliferation.
Consider the factors of social acceptance and public decision-making.
Develop a comparative analysis of fuel cycle strategies.
Who it's for
- Nuclear fuel cycle engineer wishing to specialise in Open vs Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycles.
- Waste management strategy analyst wishing to specialise in Open vs Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycles.
- Safeguards specialist wishing to specialise in Open vs Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycles.
- Energy policy analyst wishing to specialise in Open vs Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycles.
- Reprocessing engineer wishing to specialise in Open vs Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycles.
- Nuclear economics consultant wishing to specialise in Open vs Closed Nuclear Fuel Cycles.
- Graduates in engineering or science seeking to enter the nuclear fuel industry.
What you'll work with
- IAEA SSR-4 (safety of fuel cycle facilities)
- Directive 2011/70/Euratom (management of spent fuel and waste)
- IAEA INFCIRC/153 (comprehensive safeguards agreements)
- Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT)
- IAEA SSR-5 (disposal of radioactive waste)
- Royal Decree 102/2014 (management of spent fuel and radioactive waste)
6 modules · 300 h
1.1Cycle stages: mining, conversion, enrichment and fabrication1.2In-reactor stage and discharge1.3Final stages: storage and final disposal1.4Definition of open cycle1.5Definition of closed cycle1.6Partially closed cycles1.7Countries and current strategies1.8Reference data for the cycle1.9Sector vocabulary and units1.10Exercise: drawing a country's cycle
2.1Uranium reserves and resources2.2Uranium price and its history2.3Resource use efficiency in an open cycle2.4Resource gain from recycling2.5The role of thorium as an alternative resource2.6Depleted uranium and its possible use2.7Fast reactors and breeding of fissile material2.8Resource availability outlook2.9Supply dependence and geopolitics2.10Practice: calculating the uranium requirements of a fleet
3.1Waste inventory of each cycle3.2Comparing volume and activity3.3Residual heat and its effect on disposal3.4Long-term radiotoxicity3.5Effect of actinide recycling3.6Separation and transmutation: real scope3.7Need for geological storage in both cases3.8Secondary waste from recycling3.9Indicators for comparing options3.10Practice: comparing the inventories of two cycles
4.1Cost structure of the cycle4.2Fuel cost within the generation cost4.3Cost of reprocessing and fabrication of recycled fuel4.4Cost of final management in each option4.5Facility investment and amortisation4.6Project and regulatory risk4.7Existing industrial capacity4.8Technological maturity of each stage4.9Sensitivity analysis to the uranium price4.10Practice: comparing the costs of two cycles
5.1Safety risks of cycle facilities5.2Transport associated with each option5.3Physical protection of material5.4Safeguards and proliferation resistance5.5Criteria for assessing proliferation risk5.6Social acceptance of facilities5.7Public participation in decision-making5.8Reversibility of the chosen strategy5.9Intergenerational ethical dimension5.10Practice: multi-criteria analysis of options
6.1Choice of the reference nuclear fleet6.2Definition of the options to compare6.3Material balance of each option6.4Waste inventory and its evolution6.5Comparative economic analysis6.6Safety and safeguards analysis6.7Multi-criteria analysis and weighting6.8Reasoned recommendation and its conditions6.9Study report6.10Project defence
How you'll learn
Fully 100% online training on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable materials, recorded classes and an assigned technical tutor. No fixed timetable: students progress at their own pace within the intake, making it possible to combine the course with work.
Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original standard and applied exercises. The working software is SCALE (ORIGEN), Serpent, Python (NumPy), Advanced Excel, NFCSim / DYMOND (fuel cycle scenario simulation), in free, academic or evaluation versions. Case studies are based on real fuel cycle scenario simulation procedures, radiotoxicity calculations for waste and comparative economic analysis. Assessment is continuous per module, plus the final integrative project.
Build it end to end
Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.
Describe the stages of open and closed fuel cycles.
Compare the use of uranium resources in each cycle.
Analyse radiotoxicity and waste volume according to strategy.
Evaluate the economics and industrial maturity of reprocessing.
Assess the implications of safeguards and non-proliferation.
Where this takes you
Requirements
- No prior qualification required.
- Internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme's software.
- Sufficient Spanish to follow technical regulatory reading.
Ready to start?
Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.
Frequently asked questions
The programme comprises 300 hours in total, spread over 3 to 5 months. That is between 10 and 15 hours per week on average, compatible with a full-time job.
You work with SCALE (ORIGEN), Serpent, Python (NumPy), Advanced Excel, NFCSim / DYMOND (fuel cycle scenario simulation). Free, academic or evaluation versions are used, and the tutor indicates the free alternative where one exists.
An own SEIUM diploma upon passing the continuous assessment and the integrative project. It is in-house training, not an official qualification from the Ministry.
Yes. Modules passed in a course or postgraduate diploma in the same area are credited towards the advanced programme. Check the credit transfer policy when you enrol.
Related programmes
Course in Nuclear Environmental Impact Assessment
Online course of 300 h in nuclear environmental impact assessment. 6 modules covering Directive 2011/92/EU as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU (environmental impact assessment), Law 21/2013 on…
ICRP International Standards Course in Radiation Protection
Online 300-hour course in ICRP international standards in radiation protection. 6 modules covering ICRP Publication 103 (2007 Recommendations), ICRP Publication 116 (conversion coefficients for external exposure)…
Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) Level 1 Course
Online 300-hour course in Probabilistic Safety Assessment (PSA) Level 1. 6 modules covering IAEA SSG-3 (Rev.1) (Level 1 PSA), ASME/ANS RA-Sa-2009 (PSA standard) and RiskSpectrum PSA.…
More in Nuclear Engineering & Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies
All Nuclear Engineering & Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies programmes → · How to apply · Fees & financing · Scholarships