Master’s in Route Engineering: EU vs US vs China Requirements.
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in route-to-market engineering: EU vs US vs China requirements. 12 modules covering comparative regulation of the connected car, cybersecurity, data, type approval and automation across the EU, the United States, China and other markets, with an assigned technical tutor.
Take the controls.
Run a real engineering trade-off from this field. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.
What you will be able to do
Compare the regulatory models of the EU, the US and China.
Analyse cybersecurity and software obligations in each region.
Interpret data protection and data localisation requirements.
Evaluate type-approval and automation frameworks.
Design product architectures for multiple compliance.
Organise the regulatory affairs function.
Draw up regulatory roadmaps for global products.
Who it's for
- Automotive regulatory affairs specialists.
- International compliance consultants.
- Global type-approval managers.
- Technology policy analysts.
- Connected-platform architects facing requirements in several markets.
- Regulatory risk managers.
- Engineering or science graduates seeking to enter the automotive sector.
What you'll work with
- UN Regulation No. 155 (vehicle cybersecurity)
- UN Regulation No. 156 (software updates)
- Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 (General Safety Regulation)
- Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 (Cyber Resilience Act)
- GB 44495-2024 (vehicle cybersecurity technical requirements, China)
- GB 44496-2024 (software update requirements, China)
- Personal Information Protection Law of China (2021) (personal data protection)
- NHTSA Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles (2022) (US federal guidance)
- Polarion
- Jira
- Power BI
- Python (pandas)
- Confluence
12 modules · 1900 h
1.1Regulatory models: type approval versus self-certification1.2Regulatory actors in the EU, the US and China1.3Convergence and divergence of requirements1.4Geopolitics and automotive technology1.5Impact on product strategy1.6Global platforms and regional variants1.7Costs of multiple compliance1.8Global regulatory trends1.9Sources for regulatory monitoring1.10Case study: requirements matrix for a global vehicle
2.1Regulations R155 and R156 in type approval2.2General Safety Regulation2.3Cyber Resilience Act and its scope2.4NIS2 Directive for manufacturers2.5Data Act and vehicle data2.6AI Act and the automotive sector2.7GDPR and the connected vehicle2.8EDPB guidelines on connected vehicles2.9Market surveillance2.10Practical exercise: analysis of a manufacturer's obligations in the EU
3.1Automated driving systems regulation3.2Small-series type approval3.3Mandatory ADAS requirements3.4eCall and its evolution3.5Event data recorders3.6Euro 7 and on-board monitoring3.7Access to repair data3.8One-stop shop for type approval3.9European regulatory trends3.10Case study: the General Safety Regulation across a model range
4.1NHTSA and the FMVSS4.2Self-certification and recalls4.3NHTSA cybersecurity best practices4.4Standing General Order on crash reporting4.5Exemptions for automated vehicles4.6Federal automated vehicle policy4.7Federal Trade Commission and privacy4.8Rules on foreign connected-vehicle technology4.9Litigation and liability4.10Lab: analysis of a software recall campaign
5.1State autonomous vehicle laws5.2California: DMV and CPUC5.3CCPA and CPRA privacy laws5.4Right to repair5.5California emissions standards5.6SAE and ISO in the US5.7Auto-ISAC in the United States5.8Insurance and liability5.9Differences between states5.10Practical exercise: comparison of testing requirements in three states
6.1Cybersecurity Law6.2Data Security Law6.3Personal Information Protection Law6.4Provisions on automotive data6.5Data localisation6.6International data transfers6.7Security assessments6.8GB 44495 on vehicle cybersecurity6.9GB 44496 on software updates6.10Case study: data architecture to meet Chinese requirements
7.1The CCC system and MIIT7.2Product access management7.3GB standards for ADAS7.4Automated driving pilots7.5OTA update management7.6C-NCAP and C-IASI7.7Maps and geolocation7.8Electric vehicle requirements7.9Market entry for foreign manufacturers7.10Practical exercise: type-approval plan for a European model in China
8.1Japan and its adoption of R155/R1568.2South Korea8.3India and AIS8.4The United Kingdom after Brexit8.5Australia and ADR8.6Middle Eastern markets8.7Latin American markets8.8Global adoption of UN regulations8.9Emerging Asian markets8.10Workshop: compliance roadmap across five markets
9.1Region-based design9.2Software variants9.3Data management by jurisdiction9.4Regional cloud platforms9.5Configuration management9.6Regulatory feature flags9.7Market-specific updates9.8Compliance testing9.9Cost management9.10Lab: designing a multi-region data architecture
10.1Regulatory affairs teams10.2Systematic regulatory monitoring10.3Participation in WP.29 and ISO10.4Relationship with authorities10.5Regulatory impact assessment10.6Internal communication of changes10.7Regulatory risk management10.8Monitoring tools10.9Compliance indicators10.10Case study: a manufacturer's regulatory monitoring process
11.1Technological competition between blocs11.2Restrictions on components and software11.3Supply chains and localisation11.4International manufacturer alliances11.5Open versus proprietary standards11.6Regulatory risk in strategy11.7Divergence scenarios11.8Lessons from business cases11.9Strategic recommendations to senior management11.10Practical exercise: five-year regulatory scenario analysis
12.1Selecting the product or service12.2EU regulatory analysis12.3US regulatory analysis12.4China regulatory analysis12.5Gaps and conflicts12.6Compliance architecture12.7Regulatory roadmap12.8Conclusions and future work12.9Master's Thesis report12.10Master's Thesis: defence before a panel
How you'll learn
100% online learning on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable material, recorded classes and an assigned technical tutor. There are no fixed timetables: you progress at your own pace within each intake, making it compatible with work.
Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original regulations and applied exercises. The working software is Polarion, Jira, Power BI, Python (pandas) and Confluence, in free, academic or evaluation versions. Practical work is based on real procedures: comparative regulatory requirement matrices, analysis of recall campaigns and the design of multi-region compliance architectures. Assessment is continuous for each module, plus the final Master's Thesis.
Standards covered: UN Regulation No. 155, UN Regulation No. 156, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 (Cyber Resilience Act), GB 44495-2024, GB 44496-2024, China's Personal Information Protection Law (2021) and NHTSA Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles (2022).
Build it end to end
Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.
Where this takes you
Requirements
- A university degree in engineering, science or architecture, or equivalent demonstrable professional experience.
- An internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme software.
- English sufficient to read technical standards.
Ready to start?
Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.
Frequently asked questions
The programme totals 1,900 hours over 12–14 months. You set your own pace within each intake, and your tutor helps you plan the workload around your job.
You work with Polarion, Jira, Power BI, Python (pandas) and Confluence, using free, academic or evaluation versions. Your tutor indicates the free alternative wherever one exists.
A SEIUM Institute diploma, awarded on passing the continuous assessment and the Master's Thesis. It is SEIUM's own qualification, not an official state degree; its recognition depends on the programme completed and the regulations of each country.
Yes. Modules passed in a course or postgraduate diploma in the same area are recognised in the higher programme. Ask about the recognition policy when you enrol.
A university degree in engineering, science or architecture (or equivalent professional experience), a computer able to run the programme software and English sufficient to read technical standards.
Start dates are set by SEIUM's faculty for each intake. Our admissions team will confirm the next available date when you apply.
Related programmes
Master’s in Route Engineering: Alignment with Regional Audits.
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in route-to-market engineering: alignment with audits by region. 12 modules covering regional audit ecosystems, multi-region requirements, type-approval and factory audits…
Master’s in Route Engineering: EASA vs FAA vs CAAC/ANAC.
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in route engineering: EASA vs FAA vs CAAC/ANAC, structured in 12 modules covering comparative aviation authorities, EASA versus FAA regulation,…
Master’s in Dangerous Goods and Battery Transport Engineering
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in dangerous goods and battery transport engineering, structured in 12 modules covering classification, lithium battery technology and risks, UN 38.3…
More in Regulation, Safety, RAMS & Homologation
All Regulation, Safety, RAMS & Homologation programmes → · How to apply · Fees & financing · Scholarships