Master’s in Route Engineering: EASA vs FAA vs CAAC/ANAC.
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in route engineering: EASA vs FAA vs CAAC/ANAC, structured in 12 modules covering comparative aviation authorities, EASA versus FAA regulation, delegation and organisations, CAAC, ANAC and Latin America, bilateral agreements, type certificate validation, production and export, maintenance and operations, new technologies by region and global certification strategy, with an assigned technical tutor.
Take the controls.
Run a real engineering trade-off from this field. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.
What you will be able to do
Compare the regulatory frameworks of EASA, the FAA, CAAC and ANAC.
Analyse systems of delegation to industry.
Apply bilateral aviation safety agreements.
Manage type certificate validation processes.
Coordinate production and export with several authorities.
Assess regulatory differences for new technologies.
Design global aviation certification strategies.
Who it's for
- International validation managers at aircraft manufacturers
- Aviation certification engineers
- Aviation regulatory affairs specialists
- Aviation export managers
- Auditors of approved organisations
- Global certification consultants
- Engineering or science graduates looking to enter the aerospace sector
What you'll work with
- Regulation (EU) 748/2012 (Part-21) (EU certification of aircraft and design and production organisations)
- 14 CFR Part 21 (FAA certification procedures for products and articles)
- CCAR-21 (Chinese certification procedures for civil aviation products)
- RBAC 21 (Brazilian certification of aeronautical products)
- EU–US Aviation Safety Agreement (bilateral recognition of certification findings)
- 14 CFR Part 25 (FAA airworthiness standards for transport category aeroplanes)
- CS-25 (EASA certification specifications for large aeroplanes)
- ICAO Annex 8 (airworthiness of aircraft)
- EASA Rulebook
- FAA DRS
- IBM DOORS
- Microsoft Project
12 modules · 1900 h
1.1EASA and its European model1.2The FAA and its structure1.3CAAC and its role in China1.4ANAC Brazil and ANAC Argentina1.5Transport Canada Civil Aviation1.6ICAO USOAP audits1.7Comparative technical capabilities1.8Delegation to industry1.9Bilateral relations between authorities1.10Case study: organisation charts of four authorities
2.1Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 versus 14 CFR2.2Part-21 versus 14 CFR Part 212.3CS versus Part 25 and Part 232.4AMC and GM versus Advisory Circulars2.5Special conditions and issue papers2.6CRIs versus issue papers2.7Relevant technical differences2.8EASA–FAA harmonisation2.9Managing differences within a programme2.10Workshop: table of differences between CS-25 and Part 25
3.1DOA under EASA3.2ODA under the FAA3.3DER designees and their evolution3.4POA versus the FAA Production Certificate3.5Comparison of privileges by organisation3.6Oversight of organisations3.7Audits and findings3.8Holder responsibility3.9Lessons from the 737 MAX3.10Practical exercise: comparing DOA and ODA
4.1CCAR-21 and its structure4.2Certification of the C9194.3Validation of foreign products4.4Bilateral agreement with the US4.5Relationship with EASA4.6Production requirements in China4.7Continuing airworthiness management4.8Language and documentation4.9Trends in Chinese regulation4.10Case study: CAAC validation of a European aircraft
5.1RBAC 21 in Brazil5.2Embraer certification5.3ANAC Argentina and RAAC5.4The SRVSOP regional system5.5LAR and regional harmonisation5.6Validation of foreign certificates5.7Bilateral airworthiness agreements5.8Regional technical capability5.9Oversight challenges5.10Workshop: ANAC Brazil validation process
6.1US–EU BASA6.2TIP: Technical Implementation Procedures6.3Acceptance and validation6.4Levels of involvement in validation6.5Significant standards differences (SSD)6.6Agreements with Canada and Brazil6.7Agreements with China6.8Agreements with the United Kingdom6.9Recognition of organisations6.10Practical exercise: analysis of the EASA–FAA TIP
7.1The validation process7.2Familiarisation of the validating authority7.3Validation items7.4Certification issues7.5Differences in requirements7.6Additional validation tests7.7Typical validation timescales7.8Validation costs7.9Management of the validation project7.10Case study: FAA validation of an EASA TC
8.1Export certificates8.2EASA Form 1 and FAA 8130-38.3Dual release of components8.4Export certificates of airworthiness8.5Import requirements8.6Manufacturing in multiple countries8.7Oversight of foreign suppliers8.8Unapproved parts8.9Documentary traceability of parts8.10Workshop: dual release of components
9.1Part-145 versus 14 CFR Part 1459.2Part-M and Part-CAMO9.3Maintenance licences9.4EASA and FAA air operations9.5Airworthiness directives9.6Recognition of repair stations9.7Maintenance in third countries9.8Authority audits9.9Practical differences in oversight9.10Practical exercise: approving a repair station for EASA and FAA
10.1eVTOL: SC-VTOL versus the FAA approach10.2Powered-lift and FAA requirements10.3Certified drones by region10.4Sustainable aviation fuels10.5Electric and hybrid propulsion10.6Artificial intelligence in avionics10.7Applicable cybersecurity requirements10.8Differences in regulatory pace10.9Dual certification strategies10.10Case study: an eVTOL for EASA and FAA
11.1Selection of the primary authority11.2Validation planning11.3Management of differences in requirements11.4Multinational certification teams11.5Relationship with several authorities11.6Geopolitical risk assessment11.7Global costs and timescales11.8Progress indicators11.9Lessons-learned register11.10Workshop: global certification plan for an aircraft
12.1Selection of aviation product12.2Comparative analysis of authorities12.3Primary certification route12.4Validation plan12.5Management of differences12.6Production and export plan12.7Risk analysis12.8Conclusions and future lines of work12.9Thesis report12.10Master's Thesis: defence before a panel
How you'll learn
Training is 100% online on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable material, recorded classes and an assigned technical tutor. There are no fixed timetables: you progress at your own pace within each intake, so you can combine the programme with your job.
Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original regulations and applied exercises. The working software is EASA Rulebook, FAA DRS, IBM DOORS and Microsoft Project, in free, academic or evaluation versions. Practice is based on real procedures: type certificate validation processes, regulatory difference analyses and design organisation audits. Assessment is continuous for each module, plus the final Master's Thesis.
Standards covered: Regulation (EU) 748/2012 (Part-21), 14 CFR Part 21, CCAR-21, RBAC 21, EU–US Aviation Safety Agreement, 14 CFR Part 25, CS-25, ICAO Annex 8.
Build it end to end
Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.
Where this takes you
Requirements
- A university degree in engineering, science or architecture, or equivalent demonstrable professional experience.
- An internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme's software.
- English sufficient to read technical standards.
Ready to start?
Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.
Frequently asked questions
The programme totals 1,900 hours over 12–14 months. You set your own pace within each intake, and your tutor helps you plan the workload around your job.
You work with EASA Rulebook, FAA DRS, IBM DOORS and Microsoft Project, using free, academic or evaluation versions. Your tutor indicates the free alternative wherever one exists.
A SEIUM Institute diploma, awarded on passing the continuous assessment and the Master's Thesis. It is SEIUM's own qualification, not an official state degree; its recognition depends on the programme completed and the regulations of each country.
Yes. Modules passed in a course or postgraduate diploma in the same area are recognised in the higher programme. Ask about the recognition policy when you enrol.
A university degree in engineering, science or architecture, or equivalent professional experience, plus English sufficient to read technical standards.
Start dates are set by SEIUM's faculty for each intake. Our admissions team will confirm the next available date when you apply.
Related programmes
Route Engineering: national legal frameworks.
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in route-to-market engineering: national legal frameworks. 12 modules covering law and technical safety, the Spanish, European, American and Asia-Pacific frameworks…
Master’s in Vehicle Cybersecurity Engineering and OTA Updates
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in vehicle cybersecurity and OTA update engineering, structured in 12 modules covering the connected vehicle attack surface, E/E architecture and…
Master’s in Type-Approval Routes Engineering: Latin NCAP, Customs and Local Requirements
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in regulatory route engineering for Latin NCAP, customs and local requirements. 12 modules covering the Latin NCAP assessment protocols, ALADI…
More in Regulation, Safety, RAMS & Homologation
All Regulation, Safety, RAMS & Homologation programmes → · How to apply · Fees & financing · Scholarships