Master’s in Regional Routes for Interoperability and Incentives Engineering
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in regional route engineering for e-mobility interoperability and incentives. 12 modules covering Regulation (EU) 2023/1804 AFIR, 23 CFR Part 680 National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Standards, ISO 15118-20:2022, roaming protocols, purchase and infrastructure incentives and EVerest, with an assigned technical tutor.
Take the controls.
Run a real engineering trade-off from this field. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.
What you will be able to do
Understand the interoperability layers of e-mobility.
Apply the requirements of the AFIR Regulation in Europe.
Compare the regulatory routes of the United States, China and other markets.
Implement roaming protocols such as OCPI.
Analyse purchase and infrastructure incentives.
Assess integration with energy markets.
Design deployment strategies across several regions.
Who it's for
- Charging infrastructure project managers.
- Interoperability specialists.
- E-mobility policy analysts.
- Grants and subsidies managers.
- Electrification strategy consultants.
- Roaming managers.
- Engineering or science graduates looking to join charge point operators.
What you'll work with
- Regulation (EU) 2023/1804 AFIR (alternative fuels infrastructure)
- 23 CFR Part 680 (National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Standards)
- ISO 15118-20:2022 (vehicle-to-grid communication)
- IEC 61851-1:2017 (conductive charging systems)
- OCPI 2.2.1 (roaming protocol)
- GB/T 27930-2023 (conductive charging communication, China)
- Directive (EU) 2024/1275 (energy performance of buildings)
- Royal Decree 266/2021 (MOVES III programme, Spain)
- EVerest
- Hubject intercharge
- QGIS
- Power BI
12 modules · 1900 h
1.1Concept of technical and commercial interoperability1.2Physical, communication and service layers1.3Roaming between operators1.4User identification1.5Payment methods1.6Open charging data1.7Regional differences in standards1.8Market barriers1.9Ecosystem stakeholders1.10Case study: a driver's experience on a cross-border journey
2.1General requirements of the AFIR Regulation2.2Fleet-based power targets2.3Trans-European network corridors2.4Mandatory ad hoc payment2.5Price transparency2.6National access points2.7Energy Performance of Buildings Directive2.8Renewable Energy Directive2.9State aid and CEF2.10Practical exercise: AFIR compliance check for a station
3.1Federal NEVI programme3.2Minimum standards in 23 CFR Part 6803.3NACS and CCS connector requirements3.4Domestic manufacturing requirements3.530C and 30D tax credits3.6State charging programmes3.7Uptime requirements3.8Data and reporting3.9California requirements3.10Case study: application for NEVI funding
4.1GB/T charging standards4.2ChaoJi charging system4.3Battery swapping4.4Monitoring platforms4.5Local charging subsidies4.6Interconnection requirements4.7Dominant operating companies4.8Grid integration4.9Rural charging policies4.10Practical exercise: comparison of Chinese and European models
5.1CHAdeMO and its evolution5.2Japanese charging incentives5.3Korean charging infrastructure5.4Indian charging standards5.5The FAME programme and its successor5.6Bharat charging standards5.7Two- and three-wheelers5.8Battery swapping in India5.9Regional interoperability in Asia5.10Case study: charging strategy for India
6.1OCPI roaming protocol6.2Hubject OICP6.3Roaming platforms6.4Operator identifiers6.5Roaming contracts6.6Settlement and invoicing6.7Plug and Charge across ecosystems6.8Charging point data quality6.9API security6.10Laboratory: exchanging charging point data via OCPI
7.1Incentive design7.2MOVES III plan7.3Ecological bonus in France7.4Tax incentives in Germany7.5Tax credits in the United States7.6Incentives in Asia7.7Eligibility requirements7.8Market effects7.9Efficiency assessment7.10Workshop: impact model for a subsidy programme
8.1Subsidy programmes for charging points8.2European infrastructure funds8.3Carbon credits for operators8.4Certificate mechanisms8.5Public charging tenders8.6Motorway concessions8.7Accessibility requirements8.8Justification of subsidies8.9Grant audits8.10Practical exercise: preparing a subsidy application
9.1Heavy-duty vehicle requirements in AFIR9.2Truck charging and MCS9.3Bus electrification9.4Fleet incentives9.5Depot charging management9.6CO₂ standards for heavy-duty vehicles9.7Electrified logistics corridors9.8Hydrogen versus battery9.9Business models9.10Case study: electrification of a logistics depot
10.1Network access tariffs10.2Energy suppliers and prices10.3Demand management10.4Stationary storage at stations10.5Bidirectional charging and grid services10.6Flexibility markets10.7Guarantees of origin10.8Grid connection and lead times10.9Regulation of operators10.10Workshop: energy cost analysis for a station
11.1Comparison of regional routes11.2Global product with variants11.3Alliances with operators11.4Regulatory risks by region11.5Deployment budget11.6Success indicators11.7Market scenarios11.8Communication to investors11.9Long-term planning11.10Practical exercise: deployment plan across three regions
12.1Definition of the business case12.2Analysis of regional routes12.3Interoperability requirements12.4Incentives study12.5Technical design of the solution12.6Economic analysis of the deployment12.7Deployment plan12.8Interoperability and market risks12.9Master's Thesis report12.10Master's Thesis: defence before a panel
How you'll learn
100% online learning on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable material, recorded classes and an assigned technical tutor. There are no fixed timetables: you progress at your own pace within the intake, so the programme fits around your job.
Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original regulation and applied exercises. The working software is EVerest, Hubject intercharge, QGIS and Power BI, in free, academic or evaluation versions. Cases are studied on real procedures: an AFIR compliance check for a charging station, a subsidy application for charging infrastructure and a charging deployment plan across several regions. Assessment is continuous by module, plus the final Master's Thesis.
Standards covered: Regulation (EU) 2023/1804 AFIR, 23 CFR Part 680, ISO 15118-20:2022, IEC 61851-1:2017, OCPI 2.2.1, GB/T 27930-2023, Directive (EU) 2024/1275, Royal Decree 266/2021 MOVES III.
Build it end to end
Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.
Where this takes you
Requirements
- University degree in engineering, science or architecture, or equivalent demonstrable professional experience.
- Internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme software.
- English sufficient to read technical standards.
Ready to start?
Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.
Frequently asked questions
The programme totals 1,900 hours over 12–14 months. You set your own pace within each intake, and your tutor helps you plan the workload around your job.
You work with EVerest, Hubject intercharge, QGIS and Power BI, using free, academic or evaluation versions. Your tutor indicates the free alternative wherever one exists.
A SEIUM Institute diploma, awarded on passing the continuous assessment and the Master's Thesis. It is SEIUM's own qualification, not an official state degree; its recognition depends on the programme completed and the regulations of each country.
Yes. Modules passed in a course or postgraduate diploma in the same area are recognised in the higher programme. Ask about the recognition policy when you enrol.
A university degree in engineering, science or architecture (or equivalent professional experience), a computer able to run the programme software, and English sufficient to read technical standards.
Start dates are set by SEIUM's faculty for each intake. Our admissions team will confirm the next available date when you apply.
Related programmes
Software and Dataset Traceability Engineering (AI Act), Audits and Technical Evidence for Authorities.
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in software and dataset traceability (AI Act), audits and technical evidence for authorities. 12 modules covering the AI Act, high-risk…
Master’s in Route Engineering: EASA vs FAA vs CAAC/ANAC.
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in route engineering: EASA vs FAA vs CAAC/ANAC, structured in 12 modules covering comparative aviation authorities, EASA versus FAA regulation,…
Master’s in Type-Approval Routes Engineering: EU, US, Japan/Korea, China
Online master's programme of 1,900 hours in hydrogen regulatory routes for the EU, US, Japan/Korea and China. 12 modules covering GTR 13 and UN R134, the…
More in Regulation, Safety, RAMS & Homologation
All Regulation, Safety, RAMS & Homologation programmes → · How to apply · Fees & financing · Scholarships