CourseNuclear Engineering & Nuclear Fuel Cycle Technologies Applications open

Course in Ethics of Reprocessing and Nuclear Proliferation

Online 300-hour Course in Ethics of Reprocessing and Nuclear Proliferation. 6 Modules covering the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT, 1968), INFCIRC/153 (comprehensive safeguards agreements) and SCALE. Assigned tutor and open enrolment.

Duration300 h
ModeOnline
Start datesSet by the faculty
AwardSEIUM Institute certificate
Virtual lab · try it before you enrol

Take the controls.

Run a real engineering trade-off from this field. Move the sliders, watch the model react in real time and beat the challenge.

SIM · LIVE ●
Learning outcomes

What you will be able to do

01

Explain reprocessing and its relationship to proliferation risk.

02

Describe the international non-proliferation regime applicable to plutonium.

03

Analyse the conflicting ethical arguments on the closed cycle.

04

Evaluate governance and confidence-building measures.

05

Assess professional responsibility in decisions on sensitive technologies.

06

Compare the reprocessing policies of different countries.

07

Produce an integrated ethical analysis of a reprocessing policy.

Profile

Who it's for

  • Non-proliferation analyst who wants to specialise in Ethics of Reprocessing and Nuclear Proliferation.
  • Safeguards technician who wants to specialise in Ethics of Reprocessing and Nuclear Proliferation.
  • Fuel cycle engineer who wants to specialise in Ethics of Reprocessing and Nuclear Proliferation.
  • Energy policy adviser who wants to specialise in Ethics of Reprocessing and Nuclear Proliferation.
  • Researcher in technology ethics who wants to specialise in Ethics of Reprocessing and Nuclear Proliferation.
  • Nuclear physical security specialist who wants to specialise in Ethics of Reprocessing and Nuclear Proliferation.
  • Graduates in engineering or science seeking to join international organisations.
Standards & tools

What you'll work with

  • Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT, 1968)
  • INFCIRC/153 (comprehensive safeguards agreements)
  • INFCIRC/549 (guidelines for the management of plutonium)
  • INFCIRC/540 (Additional Protocol)
  • INFCIRC/225/Rev.5 (physical protection of nuclear material and facilities)
  • Nuclear Suppliers Group Guidelines (INFCIRC/254)
  • IAEA SSR-4 (safety of fuel cycle facilities)
  • Euratom Treaty (Chapter VII, safety control)
Syllabus

6 modules · 300 h

  1. 1.1Open and closed fuel cycles
  2. 1.2What reprocessing seeks to achieve: resources and waste volume
  3. 1.3Where reprocessing takes place today and in what quantities
  4. 1.4Why reprocessing raises proliferation concerns
  5. 1.5Nuclear material and its classification for control purposes
  6. 1.6Difference between safety, physical protection and safeguards
  7. 1.7Actors: States, industry and international organisations
  8. 1.8Vocabulary of the non-proliferation regime
  9. 1.9Public sources of information and their reliability
  10. 1.10Exercise: map of actors in a national decision
  1. 2.1The Non-Proliferation Treaty and its three pillars
  2. 2.2Right to peaceful use and its conditions
  3. 2.3Comprehensive safeguards agreements
  4. 2.4Additional Protocol and complementary access
  5. 2.5Accounting and control of nuclear material
  6. 2.6Inspections and independent verification
  7. 2.7Supplier groups and export control
  8. 2.8Nuclear-weapon-free zones
  9. 2.9Mechanisms in the event of non-compliance
  10. 2.10Practice: analyse the regime applicable to a country
  1. 3.1Energy sovereignty versus collective risk
  2. 3.2Equity between States with and without technology
  3. 3.3Perceived discrimination in the current regime
  4. 3.4Responsibility of the technology supplier
  5. 3.5The precautionary principle applied to technology
  6. 3.6Intergenerational benefit of the closed cycle
  7. 3.7Waste management as a moral argument
  8. 3.8Legitimate secrecy versus transparency
  9. 3.9Individual professional responsibility
  10. 3.10Debate: is reprocessing ethically defensible?
  1. 4.1Multinational approaches to the fuel cycle
  2. 4.2Fuel banks and supply guarantees
  3. 4.3Facilities under international control
  4. 4.4Proliferation resistance as a design criterion
  5. 4.5Proliferation risk assessment of a system
  6. 4.6Voluntary transparency measures
  7. 4.7Verification with technology and open data
  8. 4.8Culture of safety and non-proliferation
  9. 4.9Training and responsibility of academic centres
  10. 4.10Practice: evaluate the governance of a proposal
  1. 5.1How a fuel cycle policy is decided
  2. 5.2Public participation and access to information
  3. 5.3The role of the regulator and advisory committees
  4. 5.4Professional conscientious objection
  5. 5.5Professional codes of ethics for nuclear engineers
  6. 5.6Conflicts of interest in technical advisory work
  7. 5.7Honest communication of risks to the public
  8. 5.8Duty to report irregularities
  9. 5.9Protection of whistleblowers
  10. 5.10Practice: ethical opinion for an advisory committee
  1. 6.1Choice of a specific policy or decision
  2. 6.2Description of the technical and legal context
  3. 6.3Identification of interests and of those affected
  4. 6.4Analysis of the ethical arguments at stake
  5. 6.5Evaluation of governance alternatives
  6. 6.6Reasoned proposal with its conditions
  7. 6.7Transparency and verification measures
  8. 6.8Public participation plan
  9. 6.9Analysis report
  10. 6.10Defence of the work
Methodology, software & labs

How you'll learn

100% online training on the SEIUM campus, with downloadable material, recorded classes and assigned technical tutor. No fixed timetables: students progress at their own pace within the enrolment period, which makes it possible to combine the programme with work.

Each module combines theory, guided reading of the original standard and applied exercises. The working software is SCALE, Zotero, NVivo, advanced Excel, in free, academic or evaluation versions. Assessments are based on real plutonium material balance analysis procedures, structured ethical debate on the closed cycle, and comparative study of reprocessing policies. Assessment is continuous by module, plus the final integrating project.

Accreditable laboratories(EN ISO/IEC 17025) with rotor bank, EMC/Lightning pre-compliance, HIL/SIL, vibration/acoustics.
Evidence-oriented final project:safety case, test plan, compliance dossier and operational limits.
Industry mentoring:lecturers with experience in training, , eVTOL/UAM and flight test.
Flexible format(hybrid/online), international cohorts and support from SEIUM Career Services.
Ethics and safety:safety-by-design approach, cyber-OT, DIH and compliance as pillars.
Capstone project

Build it end to end

Your final project follows the real engineering workflow, step by step, reviewed by your tutor.

Choice of a specific policy or decision

Explain reprocessing and its relationship to proliferation risk.

Description of the technical and legal context

Describe the international non-proliferation regime applicable to plutonium.

Identification of interests and of those affected

Analyse the conflicting ethical arguments on the closed cycle.

Analysis of the ethical arguments at stake

Evaluate governance and confidence-building measures.

Evaluation of governance alternatives

Assess professional responsibility in decisions on sensitive technologies.

Career opportunities

Where this takes you

Non-proliferation analystSafeguards technicianFuel cycle engineerEnergy policy adviserResearcher in technology ethicsNuclear physical security specialist
Admissions & scholarships

Requirements

  • No prior qualification is required.
  • Internet connection and a computer capable of running the programme's software.
  • Sufficient command of Spanish to follow technical regulatory texts.

Ready to start?

Send your application today. Our admissions team replies within 72 hours with your study plan and funding options.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

The programme comprises 300 total hours spread over 3 to 5 months. That is between 10 and 15 hours per week on average, compatible with full-time work.

You will work with SCALE, Zotero, NVivo, advanced Excel. Free, academic or evaluation versions are used, and the tutor indicates the free alternative where one exists.

An own SEIUM diploma upon passing the continuous assessment and the integrating project. It is in-house training, not an official Ministry qualification.

Yes. Modules passed in a Course or Postgraduate Diploma in the same area are credited towards the higher programme. Check the recognition policy when you enrol.

Course in Ethics of Reprocessing and Nuclear ProliferationEnrol
Scroll to Top
SEIUM – Institute of Advanced Engineering
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.